World


Category: WorldJanuary 16th, 2006

In December, there were reports of dozens of people being killed by police, following a demonstration in Dongzhou, China.

State media have said the incident left three dead and eight wounded, but residents have said the shooting resulted in the deaths of as many as 20 villagers.

…dissidents described this month’s incident as “the first large-scale shooting of ordinary people by the Chinese government since the June 4, 1989, [Tiananmen] massacre.”

It was the first I had heard of current political unrest in China, but it wasn’t the only recent incident:

The crackdown by officials in Dongzhou was similar to the response by authorities to riots that have erupted with increasingly frequency across China over the past two years, according to accounts by witnesses and participants.

Today, this: Girl, 13, Dies as Police Battle Chinese Villagers (NYT reg. required)

A week of protests by villagers in China’s southern industrial heartland exploded into violence over the weekend with thousands of police officers brandishing automatic weapons and using electric batons to put down the rally , residents of the village said today.

As many as 60 people were injured, residents of Panlong village said, and at least one person, a 13-year-old girl, had been killed by security forces, they said…

Unlike the events at Dongzhou, an out-of-the-way fishing village, the latest confrontation between villagers and a large-scale deployment of security forces has occurred in a rural enclave encircled by some of China’s biggest and fastest growing industrial cities.

Indeed, demonstrating residents of Panlong village said their anger had been sparked by a government land acquisition program…

[A villager identifed as Hou says:] “The economic deals set in the past were not favorable, and many zones here have had smaller protests before, but the people were not united.”

“Now,” he added, “there are uprisings everywhere.”

China has been propping up North Korea with economic aid, because they fear the potential side-effects of their neighbour’s collapse.

But what happens if the Chinese regime falls first?

Category: WorldJuly 7th, 2005

In counterpoint to the Live 8 theory of how to cure Africa (i.e. “Give us yer fokkin’ money”), Der Spiegel has an interesting interview with Kenyan economics expert James Shikwati, in which he makes the case that foreign aid is causing long-term harm to Africa.

SPIEGEL: Mr. Shikwati, the G8 summit at Gleneagles is about to beef up the development aid for Africa…

Shikwati: … for God’s sake, please just stop.

SPIEGEL: Stop? The industrialized nations of the West want to eliminate hunger and poverty.

Shikwati: Such intentions have been damaging our continent for the past 40 years. If the industrial nations really want to help the Africans, they should finally terminate this awful aid. The countries that have collected the most development aid are also the ones that are in the worst shape. Despite the billions that have poured in to Africa, the continent remains poor.

SPIEGEL: Do you have an explanation for this paradox?

Shikwati: Huge bureaucracies are financed (with the aid money), corruption and complacency are promoted, Africans are taught to be beggars and not to be independent. In addition, development aid weakens the local markets everywhere and dampens the spirit of entrepreneurship that we so desperately need. As absurd as it may sound: Development aid is one of the reasons for Africa’s problems. If the West were to cancel these payments, normal Africans wouldn’t even notice. Only the functionaries would be hard hit. Which is why they maintain that the world would stop turning without this development aid.

Shikwati’s premise is simple. Western nations go to great lengths to protect their industries from cheap imports. In Canada, consider what we have done to protect automobile and aircraft manfacturing, and milk, egg and wheat production>. In the United States, the phrase “anti-dumping” refers not only to imports that are being sold at less than the cost of production at the source, but less than it would cost to produce in the U.S.

Yet in Africa, we destroy markets for goods such as food and textiles with thousands of tonnes of cheap or free clothes, wheat and corn.

Shikwati: But it has to be the Kenyans themselves who help these people. When there’s a drought in a region of Kenya, our corrupt politicians reflexively cry out for more help. This call then reaches the United Nations World Food Program — which is a massive agency of apparatchiks who are in the absurd situation of, on the one hand, being dedicated to the fight against hunger while, on the other hand, being faced with unemployment were hunger actually eliminated. It’s only natural that they willingly accept the plea for more help. And it’s not uncommon that they demand a little more money than the respective African government originally requested. They then forward that request to their headquarters, and before long, several thousands tons of corn are shipped to Africa. … Local farmers may as well put down their hoes right away; no one can compete with the UN’s World Food Program. And because the farmers go under in the face of this pressure, Kenya would have no reserves to draw on if there actually were a famine next year. It’s a simple but fatal cycle.

And labour markets are distorted when the best chance to become rich is to be a friend of the ruling party, and the failing that the best-paying jobs are with aid agencies and NGOs.

Shikwati: … There must be a change in mentality. We have to stop perceiving ourselves as beggars. These days, Africans only perceive themselves as victims. On the other hand, no one can really picture an African as a businessman. In order to change the current situation, it would be helpful if the aid organizations were to pull out.

SPIEGEL: If they did that, many jobs would be immediately lost …

Shikwati: … jobs that were created artificially in the first place and that distort reality. Jobs with foreign aid organizations are, of course, quite popular, and they can be very selective in choosing the best people. When an aid organization needs a driver, dozens apply for the job. And because it’s unacceptable that the aid worker’s chauffeur only speaks his own tribal language, an applicant is needed who also speaks English fluently — and, ideally, one who is also well mannered. So you end up with some African biochemist driving an aid worker around, distributing European food, and forcing local farmers out of their jobs. That’s just crazy!

(Seen via Nealenews.)

Category: WorldMarch 18th, 2005

Fidel Castro is upset that Forbes magazine ranked him one of the world’s richest men, with an estimated net worth of $550 million.

From CNN:

“Once again, they have committed the infamy of speaking about Castro’s fortune, placing me almost above the queen of England,” Castro said in a speech to top officials of Cuba’s ruling Communist Party, military and police.

“Do they think I am (former Zairian President) Mobutu (Sese Seko) or one of the many millionaires, those thieves and plunderers, that the empire has suckled and protected?” he said in reference to his capitalist archenemy, the United States.

An official statement by the Cuban government said that Cuba “has the fairest income distribution in the world.” Sure, the entire population lives in abject Marxist poverty. That’s like saying a graveyard has the “fairest distribution of life.”

(Update: Here comes the Brook-alanche. Thanks, Damian!)

Category: WorldMarch 16th, 2005

It was seventeen years ago today, that Saddam Hussien used poison gas to kill 5,000 people in Halabja.

Abu Ghraib may have been disturbing, but let’s not forget what kind of evil Saddam was capable of.

(via The Corner.)

Category: WorldMarch 15th, 2005

After weeks of marches by demontrators demanding Syria’s withdrawal from occupied Lebanon, last week’s pro-Syria demonstration, attended by as many as 500,000, was discouraging. (Timeline of Rallies)

Today, 1 million Druze, Christians and Sunni Muslim Lebanese marched in Beirut, chanting “Freedom, sovereignty, independence.” The optimism is thrilling to see. (See these pics at The Corner)

Even if the numbers game weren’t being won by the pro-democracy protesters, which of these demonstrations would you rather attend? (pics found via this post at Instapundit)

This one:

Caption: Syrian workers hold pictures of Syrian President Bashar Assad… Man cuts himself to show his support and commitment to his president.

Or this one:

Caption: Two Lebanese opposition demonstrators stand in a car as they flash victory signs and wave a Lebanese flag during a celebration one day after the Lebanese government’s resignation in Beirut, Lebanon, Tuesday, March 1, 2005.

More from Instapundit, and a roundup at glennreynolds.com (MSNBC) .