Is this thing on?
This is just a test post. Nothing to see here. Move along.
Sitemap identifier 138207291197 CCBot/1.0 (+http://www.commoncrawl.org/bot.html)
Is this thing on?
This is just a test post. Nothing to see here. Move along.
Sitemap identifier 138207291197 CCBot/1.0 (+http://www.commoncrawl.org/bot.html)
You may have heard of Alexandre Trudeau’s paean to his tyrant hero, Fidel Castro.
His telling of Fidel’s qualities and accomplishments is so impressive, there is only one man who can possibly compare: Chuck Norris.
So here they are head-to-head. Who’s the man?
Note: As far as we know, Alexandre Trudeau was not trying to write satire. All the quotes about Fidel Castro are taken verbatim from his article.
Beards
Winner: Chuck Norris. That’s a dangerous growth of hair.
Friendship
Winner: Fidel.
Scientific Discovery
Winner: Chuck Norris.
Thirst For Knowledge
Winner: Fidel.
On The Job, 24/7
Winner: Fidel.
Omniscience
Winner: Chuck Norris.
They Might Be Giants
Winner: Chuck. Breathing fire is cool.
Respect This!
Winner: Chuck.
Look, Up In The Sky!
Winner: Fidel.
Oxygen? Who Needs It?
Winner: Fidel. All Chuck did was fall.
Low-Carbing
Winner: Fidel. Mmm… urchins.
The Joy Of Fatherhood
Winner: Just by not throwing children into the sun, Fidel does sound like the better parent.
Yet More Awesomeness
Winner: Err… I’m starting to think the authors may have boy-crushes on their respective subjects.
Okay, Now You’ve Lost Me
Winner: Frankly, neither of these statements seem remotely plausible to me.
The Final Verdict
If all this is taken at face value, Chuck Norris would clearly be the ass-kickingest man in any fight.
From an entertainment standpoint, however, Alexandre’s article is much funnier than even Chuck Norris.
Ibbitson: “Dangerously Deluded”
John Ibbitson ($) on the war on terror, and Canada’s role in the Anglosphere:
Our advantage over them lies in our unity. The various Muslim terrorist organizations would probably be fighting each other if they weren’t fighting us. But Western nations see things the same way. We share our intelligence. We jointly preserve our liberties despite tough anti-terrorism legislation, and keep our borders open to each other despite all the new security measures.
That is why those who accuse the Prime Minister of tying Canada too closely to the United States are so dangerously deluded. Winning the war on terror depends on solidarity among the allies. It depends on those morning security briefings being as comprehensive as possible, based on mutual trust.
The worst thing we could do would be to distance ourselves, to search for a more “nuanced” stand. It would erode the trust of those whose trust we need, while doing nothing to protect us from attack.
Chronic wars last a very long time. But they do end. Twenty years ago, no one would have predicted the end of the Cold War, the end of apartheid, an end to the Troubles. But they’re in the past, and the good guys won. The good guys will win this one, too, as long as we keep our heads and stick together, like we always have before.
Somedays I think about giving up on the Globe entirely. Not today, though.
Colby Cosh has a column in today’s L.A. Times, in which he answers questions about the Conservative’s election win:
Is Canada still the progressive, socially liberal neighbor of Democratic dreams and Republican nightmares?
Can our mythic reputation as a cleaner, politer Europe survive incoming Prime Minister Stephen Harper’s Conservative regime?
Cosh’s answer?
In modern Canada, sexual mores are largely determined by the courts, which are dominated by buck-wild, porn-loving Liberal appointees…
In the U.S., one often hears that the Bill of Rights cannot logically apply to matters the founders never imagined; our Charter of Rights was passed in 1982, when 77% of legislators kept in their desks well-thumbed copies of Oui or Screw magazine. We’re in the clear.
(h/t: markc)
Citizen to Harper: Is Now A Good Time To Talk? Yes? Great!
Prime Minister-Designate Stephen Harper’s first press conference was short and sweet. (h/t)
There was a refreshing brevity to Harper’s responses. He occasionally dodged, but he didn’t weave…
From start to finish, the entire media availability seemed to take up no more time than one of outgoing Prime Minister Paul Martin’s subordinate clauses.
Of source, you’d be brief too, if you were out of breath:
Prime minister-designate Stephen Harper was taken to the General campus of the Ottawa Hospital late last night after suffering an asthma attack.
But this part is very uncool:
Mr. Harper, 46, appeared shirtless underneath a hospital gown, and went down a quiet hallway to an area filled with examination rooms.
Approximately half an hour later, security personnel emerged from the examination area and cautiously checked out the hallway before Mr. Harper reappeared. He was fully dressed again in a long black wool coat, and accompanied by a woman and three to four security personnel.
When approached by the Citizen, Mr. Harper did not respond and continued toward the escalators with his entourage. He appeared red-faced and tired.
No wonder Paul Martin goes to a private clinic – for privacy.
For future reference, if I ever become a public figure: If I have been rushed to the hospital unable to breathe, and I’m wearing a backless gown… it’s going to be a NO COMMENT. Thanks.
I can’t wait for the Citizen’s next interview with Harper, conducted from the stall next his in a Tim Horton’s bathroom:
“Had a lot of coffee this morning, huh? Mr. Prime Minister?”
Footnote: New Communications Director William Stairs is quoted as both confirming and denying Mr. Harper’s asthma:
William Stairs, Mr. Harper’s director of communications, confirmed last night that the Conservative leader was taken to the hospital for treatment of asthma.
CTV:
“He doesn’t suffer from asthma; he had it as a child. And from time to time whenever he feels uncomfortable he goes and has things looked at,” Stairs told CTV Newsnet on Friday morning.
Totally contradictory messages on the first day, albeit on a minor matter, is not a good start for the communications team.